(Guitarist)
“Ringing the Bell with Guitar”
The first question is about the most important sound that you remembers. It could be something he heard as a child or something he heard recently.
The first time music made me feel good was when I was in elementary school and I was riding in my mom's car and we were listening to a best-of album by a classical guitarist named Narciso Yepes. I don't know why my mom had that CD, I think she played it because she thought it was good for kids' emotions rather than because she knew exactly what the music was about, but that day the guitar sounded really nice and warm, even for an elementary school kid.
The second time was when I was playing a video game, called ‘Uncharted Waters’. In that game, different music played in different cities. When I was visiting somewhere in South America, I heard bossa nova rhythms and melodies, I didn't really know what it was at the time, but something ambiguous, major or minor, sounded very good to me. It was Yoko Kanno's music. Then there was a period where I was listening to metal, and the biggest influence was a video of Led Zeppelin live at Madison Square Garden in 1973, and it was a song called 'Since I've been Loving you', and I was shocked when I heard the solo. It was blues-based, rocking, with lots of notes, but it was balanced and refined. Then I fell in love with D'Angelo's sound, which was strangely edgy, but also warm and comforting. Looking back, texture was the most important thing to me, and I was looking for a good sound rather than a genre, a sound that had room to breathe and could go somewhere rather than being full of itself.
So, your guitar tone was established by searching for sounds like that?
I didn't really have a concept of tone at first. For example, I saw an interview with guitarist Grant Green, and he said that he used to turn the highs and lows all the way down to zero on his amp and just turn the mids all the way up, so I just copied that. It's actually a very crunchy and difficult sound, but I didn't think much about it, so I just used it like that. At the same time, I was using a wah pedal, but I was so busy playing that I didn't pay attention to the sound.
But after a while, I finally realized that it sounded awkward with just the mids up.
So now I'm trying to put everything at 12 o'clock and do everything else by hand. That way I can control the change in sound, and from there I can build up the amp settings little by little. At home, I also play my electric guitar without an amp, and I can hear the sound of guitar more and more. I'm always thinking about the sound, and the first thing I was looking for was a warm sound with a long sustain. The guitar is an instrument with relatively short sustain, and I want to maximize it with my hands and strings rather than artificially fixing it with effects. I think I'm still trying to find that ideal sound that I used to hear from Narsos Yepes' classical guitars when I was a kid, where the highs are very well rounded, like a bell, and the lows are rich but not overdone.There are many guitarists who rely on effects and amplifiers, but your guitar is the opposite.
It's the complete opposite. I like to make things by hand. I recently bought an amp called the Roland Super Cube 100, which is actually a bass amp. Normally, guitar amps have 70 or 90 watts of power, so if you stroke the guitar a little hard with your hand, it will distort, but this is a bass amp, so you can hit it pretty hard. It's fat, but it sounds clean and good, but it's not too sharpy. That's what I make by hand.
You've played in several bands with different colors. Was there a different tone you were trying to achieve in each band, or were you always searching for the same sound?
What people hear in a band is the notes, the harmonies, the rhythm, the laybacks or grooves, and those things are kind of superficial and kind of like a dialect, so it's fun to try to emulate them in other bands. The thing I've always been most concerned with is the tone. How much better does the sound stick and resonate, does it harmonize in the performance, things like that.
You've tried a lot of different things musically, but I feel like your most important identity is that of an improviser. I think it's possible to categorize everything you've done so far under the theme of improvisation. Can you describe what improvisation means to you?
I used to think a lot about what music is ultimately about, and for me, it's about personal release. Doing it for other people comes after that. I do different genres because I get bored of doing the same thing every day, so I do different things, not because I think about what other people will like. If I've been doing Second Session for a long time, I want to do something that smashes like Hellyvision, and if I've been doing Hellyvision for a long time, I want to do something a little more structured. I feel like I need to keep doing it in this way, with my tail between my legs, so that I can balance it out and find peace of mind.
Improvising makes it easier to transition in the process. Even if the setting changes, I'm still the same person, so I can still say the same thing, just in a different intonation. That's why I don't do a lot of outside sessions these days. That's always a problem because I have to tell someone else's story. The story I want to tell is an abstract thing that I can't put into words, and there are vibrations that come from the personality that I have as a person, and I express them with an instrument anyway, so I think the density or kind of story is always similar.
You studied composition in college, right?
First, I graduated with a degree in classical composition, and then I took a semester of guitar at Berklee, but soon I dropped out. I couldn't afford to go to school twice.
Has the foundation of classical composition you learned in college influenced what you do now?
It had a huge impact. I still use the techniques I learned then. The most difficult part of improvising is what to do next when you get stuck, but if you think about the form of the piece and draw a guideline, it becomes easier. In classical compositions, there is such a well-organized database of how to breathe after this long breath, so I think what I analyzed while studying then is still ingrained in me.
In terms of classical compositional methods, there is counterpoint, but there are also post-war and new music composition methods that attempt to move beyond the constructivist composition of the past. Can you tell us more about the compositional methods that you considers important?
I think the different directions of contemporary music have arisen because trying to break the inertia of the past and express something different. I'm not saying that 12-tone techniques aren't musical, but I think the basic breathing and the tone you're trying to achieve should remain the same, whether it's 12-tone or atonal music.
A big influence on me is the music of the early 20th century. I listened to and studied a lot of music by Béla Bartók, who wrote a lot of music that was modern but also had folk elements. Folk music is more rhythmic than classical music, and I think studying Bartók taught me the balance between folk and modern. When I use harmony, I like to use them in a modern way, so that even if I play outside of the key, I can still recognize the original source. I think I've found the right balance now, and that's where my classical studies have helped me the most.
You've released a lot of improvised music, and even within that, you've shown very different styles. Cadejo is also an improvised music band, and there are some delicate improvisations like TEHO and some avant-garde improvisations like Beheaded. I'm sure there are many more unreleased.
I think improvised music changes depending on who you're play with. I think music is a conversation, and improvised music is not really a genre, but more related to the tone and attitude I mentioned earlier. My playing also changes depending on what the conversation is about and what the theme is. If I want to talk a little bit longer, I'll play teho, and if I want to talk a little bit more casually, I'll play cadejo.
Do you think all these different ways of speaking are necessary for you?
Yes, I need them, I think it's a temperamental thing, I don't like to speak in just one way.
When you're improvising, do you find yourself constantly thinking in your head, or do you try to clear your mind as much as possible?
When I practice on my own, I think a lot. I try to maintain a certain structure and form. For example, I might stop playing and think about the progression and variations of a theme. It's not so different from composing. But when I'm in stage, I don't think about that at all. The most important thing is to quickly understand what the other person is playing and react to it. In a performance, I try to do that first, and then I try not to be conscious of my own playing. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but if the mood is good and we're communicating with each other, it doesn't feel like I'm playing. If some sounds comes in and goes out, I just let it flow. When I'm trying to do something there, it breaks the flow and the moods becomes very artificial. Because my body is already doing the talking for the situation, so all I have to do is wait and let it happen on its own, and I just let my body be a part of the process.
In Kenny Werner's book <Effortless Mastery> he talks about something similar, that improvising is about being out of your body and just watching yourself play.
I try to play as non consciously as possible. It seems it takes a long time, but sometimes things come out that don't sound like me playing. When I was recording the Cadejo album, there were a couple songs that came out completely different, even though I didn't intend for them to, and they don't sound like me playing.